
Pros to Consolidate Versus Deconsolidation of Public School Districts
Facts about and the Pros to Consolidation
Currently, the Kooskia schools, the Elk City school and the Grangeville schools are consolidated to be the Mountain View School District 244. Here are some facts about consolidation and the pros to the current situation:
Rural school districts of the early 1900’s began consolidation
Consolidations mean continuity in education curriculum
Consolidations mean continuity in culture of education
Consolidations mean continuity in structure of education
Consolidation is usually the result of economic crises.
Consolidated public school districts operate under a more efficient and economic model.
Combined resources enrich students’ curricular offerings.
Consolidated schools offer relief to challenging staff issues by combining or adding student services (special education, speech therapy, student counseling, etc.).
A consolidated staff expands constructive expertise and experience.
Consolidation expands extracurricular activities and academics.
Consolidation equals increased student enrollment which translates to an increase in different community culture and social awareness.
Consolidation saves money through economy of scale.
A larger school district means a wider/larger tax base which means fewer or reduced tax levies.
Consolidation would reduce the onerous burden of fund raising on merchants and community for underfunded student activities.
Property values go up for small districts, not much for medium districts, and typically go down in large districts (2000+)
Where there are 500 students or less, in a district, consolidation makes sense (economy of scale)
The national trend is to consolidate. Some states mandate consolidation if enrollment falls below a given threshold.
Current School District #244
Consolidated School Districts Mean:
Fewer or reduced tax levies
Money saved
Extracurricular activities and academics expanded
More student enrichment opportunities
Facts about and the Pros to Deconsolidation
Deconsolidation is what we will all vote on this May 20th. Here are the pros and facts that would occur if we split the school district into Grangeville and Kooskia districts.
In deconsolidation, a rural school district’s community is often built around the school.
Pride and passion are stronger within a smaller school district.
Passing levies can be achieved in a smaller community that is built around its schools.
There is strong evidence that smaller schools provide a better learning environment. But, this evidence is for school districts between 260 and 2,925 students. There are about 1,050 students in the current MVSD district.
Small class size and closer student-teacher relationships often equate to better educational outcomes. (Non issue: already there is a 1:9 ratio of teachers to students in Mountain View School District 244.)
Large school districts could mean potential loss of local control. (Non issue: currently, the school district can be considered a medium district.)
Deconsolidation provides for a smaller community’s parents to interact with the teacher and administration on issues of concerns. (Non issue: already there is a 1:9 ratio of teachers to students in Mountain View School District 244.)
Smaller schools are safer than larger schools. (Non issue: again the school district can already be considered a medium district. The class sizes are not going to get smaller if CV breaks from Grangeville.)
Increases local employment via increase in administration.
Use of existing buildings. No need to build a separate school house.
Some students may need support during the trauma of change.
Proposed New School Districts #246 and #245
Deconsolidated Schools Districts Mean:
Local control
Community actively supporting schools
Robust school pride
Bottom Line: The only reason to deconsolidate is for financial or academic reasons, and as the overriding reason to deconsolidate in our school district seems to be for cultural differences, COPE is unable to support deconsolidation and urges you to vote “No”.
Sources and Data
Sources: https://www.publicschoolreview.com/average-spending-student-stats/national-data and https://www.idahoednews.org/idaho-education-data/
Idaho State average spending /student $9,308
Salmon River Joint School District (2 schools) spending/student $21,412
140 students with a student/teacher ration of 9:1
Public Schools in Salmon River Joint School District have an average math proficiency score of 44% (versus the Idaho public school average of 42%), and reading proficiency score of 55% (versus the 55% statewide average.)
Mountain View (3 districts) spending/student $10,117
48% proficient and passed (Standardized Test Data ISAT ELA 2023-24 School Year)
The primary reason to consolidate or reconsolidate is for financial or educational benefit.
MSVD enrollment 2024-2025 is 1047 students. 2023 had 1087 students. 2021-22: 1,190; 2020-21: 1,157; 2019-20: 1,239; 2018-19: 1,239; 2017-18: 1,308; 2016-17: 1,282; 2015-16: 1,239, 2014-15: 1,209; 2013-14: 1,189; 2012-13: 1,179; 2011-12: 1,165; 2010-11: 1,176; 2009-10: 1,134.
School district sizes defined (aces.ed.gov):
Large - 5,000 to 100,000
Medium - 800 to 4,999
Small - 1 - 799
Additional sources:
https://ecommons.udayton.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1217&context=eda_fac_pub
https://transparent.idaho.gov/Education
https://www.schoolstatus.com/blog/closures-and-consolidation-impact
https://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/consolidation-schools-districts